Washera_2000
June 21, 2008
Call me naive or clueless about Ethiopian politics, but my recent confrontation with the administrators of a paltalk room called "Ethiopian Forum for Political Civility" made me pause and take stock of what we have achieved or lost since the 2005 elections.
I have been a regular at many paltalk rooms over the last two to three years, mainly to use this medium to argue for the release of political prisoners in Ethiopia and introduce a new form of dialogue among all Ethiopians in the Diaspora. I felt that both the government and the prisoners had a lot to loose if this issue was not resolved peacefully. From the beginning, my position was for these elected leaders to accept the constitution unconditionally, join parliament and work side by side with their Ethiopian brothers and sisters, including those in power, to bring more democracy and good governance to our country. I strongly believed that they, the prisoners, owed the Ethiopian people and the government an apology for their mistakes and that such an apology will clear the way for the government to pardon them.
We spent hundreds of hours arguing this issue and some of us were fortunate enough to meet with some top officials in the Ethiopian government to register our concerns. To witness the release of these prisoners was the highlight of my trip to Ethiopia. However, my excitement for a bright day for Ethiopia would quickly turn sour when these prisoners showed up in the United States and started blasting the same government officials who secured their release. Worse of all, these were the same prisoners who had admitted their mistakes and asked for a pardon through the now famous "shimagiles", led by professor Ephrem Issac. If this was not enough, the so called "kinijit" ended up splitting into a multitude of mostly irrelevant entities. I never anticipated such a shameful end to what looked like a true democratic movement. One of those confused leaders who contributed to this deplorable act was one by the name of Berhanu Nega, who admitted that he was at a loss as to what direction to take in his struggle for "his" freedom and needed to climb up a Pennsylvania mountain for an epiphany, at the expense of my tax money. He is now back, actually he never left the paltalk rooms, and is seen criss-crossing the world, with "lame bora" money, preaching both peaceful and armed struggle to overthrow the Ethiopian government.
My paltalk days were numbered after the release of these prisoners and I started working closely with some government officials to add my two pennies worth to the democratic movement in Ethiopia.
That brings me to my present topic. My favorite paltalk room is Ethiopians Forum for Political Civility. I came across it during the numerous debates we had about the 2005 elections and have met most of the administrators and participants of that room. I appreciate their dedication and the service they bring to the Diaspora community and even to some people in Ethiopia, through the hundreds of interviews they have had with top government officials and other prominent individuals. We have struggled together to fight HR 2003 and many other anti-Ethiopian statements. Through it all, I have witnessed a fair and civil discussion in this room more than any other. The concept of EPRDF that empowers all ethnic groups in Ethiopia is one that appeals to me and is endorsed unanimously by the room's administrators.
Following a brief absence, I started showing up in this room occasionally and drop a word or two on issues of the day. Then one night, I put on the famous/notorious Teddy Afro song, "Yasterseriyal', hoping to comment on this song and his imprisonment. Within seconds, I was stopped and shut off from making any comments. My return a few days later to do the explaining did not last long and I was summarily banned from the room. I was told that such an insult to the woyane fighters was not to be heard or any commentary about the song was not to be tolerated.
The talk around town was that Teddy Afro was placed in prison for his temerity to speak against the leaders of the government in those famous/notorious words: " be 17 merfe bexeqomew qumixa; le lewix yagoferew zufan lay siwexa; indaminaw bale qen yaminawun keqexa; addis nigus inji lewux meche mexa." Translated loosely it means, "...When those fighters with afro hair-do, wearing tattered pants stitched together in 17 places climbed to the throne and started dolling out punishments to the leaders of the previous regime, it felt like the coming of a new monarch and not the expected change". He goes on to plead to the Almighty to forgive us all and teach us to live together in harmony. A few years ago, he allegedly refused to appear at a New Year concert at the Sheraton Addis, unless he was allowed to sing "Yasiteseriyal", forgoing $130,000 in appearance fee.
Teddy is an extremely talented Ethiopian artist, a well known composer, lyric writer and vocalist. He has since written and sang many famous songs and has toured the world attracting huge audiences, in the process becoming a millionaire many times over.
However, Teddy Afro is playing with fire. To expect absolute freedom, to go around the world and sprinkle his hatred for the EPRDF regime without some kind of repercussion back home, is being naive at best. Teddy Afro is no ordinary artist. He is famous and has sided with the opposition groups in Ethiopia and has upset many in the government. He should try to take a neutral position and work to bring opposition groups and the government together to resolve their differences. I have heard that he has apologized for "yasiteseriyal", and if true, I believe it is a good step in the right direction.
Having said that, I believe in his freedom of speech and most of all, I believe in the freedom of others to criticize or support his allegations in any forum they choose to. The cyber saber rattlers are in no position to curb such basic human rights and will only embarrass themselves. The fighters he refers to in his song, "yasiteseriyal", have nothing to be ashamed of because of the words he used to describe their clothing or the struggle they waged to come to power. To claim that he is in prison because these people were angered by his song is to demean the law of the land and to ignore the enormity of the crime that he has been accused of allegedly committing.
It is easy to see how his supporters, especially those demagogues in the Diaspora will run for such an excuse. But it behooves them to await the end of the trials before passing judgment on freedom of speech in Ethiopia. The Ethiopian government should follow very closely the trial of this individual and see to it that justice is done to the perpetrator for the crime committed, but not as a vengeance for the words in his song "Yasteseriyal."
The other words in his song should be a lesson to all of us, including to Teddy himself. "Isti tewadedu be liyunetachihu; alebelezama bemin yastawiqal ignan mewudedachihu", which translates to mean, " Let our differences be a good reason for us all to love each other." Amen.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Amen to that my friend. Your writing is refreshing and to the point. Thanks.
I don't want to call you naïve but I will have to agree with you that you are clueless when it comes to politics and people. Like you, I have keenly followed Ethiopian politics among the diaspora since the 2005 election. And I was in the PalTalk room when the incident you claim was supposed to have occured.
First of all, the song is not the reason you were bounced from the room. A week before the incident, you came into the room and wanted to get priority to pose a question to the mayor. You didn't want to wait in line and you were under the impression that your question was more important than the others. I don't believe it is fair of you to jump the queue and demand special treatment. You left the room abruptly when you did not get the treatment you demanded and you didn't return that day. As a person claiming to fight for democracy and the equal rights of all, I hope you agree that everyone must be treated equally and fairly. And I am sure you respect the Admin of the room for treating all of us equally.
The next time you visited the room, you claimed to have been treated unfairly and wanted the issue to be the topic of discussion, but we were focused on another agenda. You were persisted but we declined to change the agenda to accommodate your wishes. You then proceeded to commandeer the microphone (mic) and began to hector us with what you insisted was inside information about the identity of the next defence minister (you insinuated that the post would go to an Amhara), information you claimed to have gathered as a member of the ruling party's Amhara wing. I listening to you in disbelieve, even though I don't know the selection process, but I remember thinking that it's highly unlikely that the government would entrust such sensitive information to a person who would announce it in the paltalk. That was not all. You solemnly went on to inform us that you want to debate with the only person you felt is your match, the Prime Minister, who, in fairness to you, you said would end up winning. After your speech, you played Teddy Afro's "Yasteserial." I, however, failed to see the connection between your speech and and the song. I personally was unable to understand your message and I am sure many others felt the same way. At this point, you were given a red and the admin took over the mic and explained to you that the room's policy does not permit any music which undermines and denigrates any group. You did not say anything about Teddy or discuss his case. When I see you article, I was surprised at the extent to which you chose to go to manipulate the facts in your favour. You shamelessly transformed a petty personal matter into one about freedom of speech and Teddy Afro.
After your removal from the room, the people there whom you disturbed and offended gave their comments and the matter ended there. You, however, went on to harass the attendees. I wonder why you feel you need this much attention?
The following week you came to the room and you wanted, yet again, to be the subject of discussion but you were told that the room had moved on and that we were uninterested in the events of the preceeding week. You did not like that and called the admin a dictator and began to disturb the room. You were, consequently, bounced from the room a second time.
My understanding of the room is that all topics are allowed to be brought up for discussion. Therefore, if you want to discuss Teddy Afro, you should follow the room's rules and procedures and put the topic on the agenda. If you think the song will illuminate your point, I am sure the admin will allow you to play it. If you are still under the mistaken impression tht you are special or that the rules don't apply to you, then that is another issue. We Ethiopians should stop politicizing personal peeves and disagreements. Let us keep our egos under control.
When you first started coming to Civility, you were a supporter of Kinjiti. I remember you used to call everyone a weyane. You never understood what the room is about and that not everyone is a supporter of the current Ethiopian government. However, supporter or non supporter, attendees want to engage in a free debate about their county and challenge one another. This is the best room around for those who want to know about Ethiopia and current issues from all sides. I am sure you will agree with me.
And I think you misunderstand "Yasterseriyal." Those offended by this song take exception not to Teddy Afro's critique of the ruling party's fashion sense but only to the argument that the seventeen year struggle has not resulted in any change and that the current government is no different from their predecessor.
Having said this, I wanted to express my thoughts on Teddy Afro's case. I don't believe the ruling party will ask Teddy to apologize for his song or I did not hear heard that he was charged for it. If that is the case, the ruling party is totally in the wrong and people should be outraged. We have to be fight for Teddy's freedom at once. As far as I know, however, the government has not made it a political issue. Teddy is in court for an accident he in which he was involved and he is fighting for his freedom through the court system. I know that his music is still sold openly all over the country. So Washera, I don't know where you get your information. If you have evidence to back any f your assettions, I would love to see it. If you don't mind, I want to quote from your article.
You wrote that "he is famous and has sided with the opposition groups in Ethiopia and has upset many in the government." I don't know whether Teddy has sided with the opposition. At least I did not hear him acknowledging his sympathies in any media. On the other hand, I am not aware of any government official who was upset by his song. Once again, I don't know where you get your information. Please show us your evidence. Assumption is not evidence.
If Teddy didn't commit any crime, he should not have been arrested in the first place, period. Your two cents worth of suggestion to the government to start paying closer attention to the Diasporas because they are screaming aloud will not help the country. What you should demand from your government is a stronger court system so that everyone has a fairer shot. Whether rich or poor, powerful or powerless, famous or not, all must be treated equally. We should all be outraged if the courts set Teddy free because of his many fans.
I have followed your on PalTalk and you are always concerned about Washera and not about our country. You lose interest in a topic you feel a topic will not bring any attention to you personally, even though it might be interesting, fruitful or good for Ethiopia. If you are not the topic of discussion, you don't always stay and people are tired. You jump in and want to dominate every conversation even when you have no clue what the discussion is about. So, in closing, please don't make this issue about freedom of speech or Teddy. It is, and has always been, only about you and your ego. Let's move on and discuss and debate topics which will help our country.
God bless you.
etafulove
"Dear Etafu:
You sure have taken your time to lambast me! Most of your diatribe is completely out of context and very personal. If your topic is about my ego or lack there of, then you are the one who has a problem. My understanding of the circumstances surrounding the incident in Civility room is completely different from yours.
If you would like to come to Civility and debate me in public or come to a private chat with me, I may have a word or two to say to you. If not, keep your opinions to yourself and good luck.
Washera
ps: I rarely open this e-mail box and that is why I responded to you today."
Dear Washera,
Yes, I took my time to respond to your article because:
1) My understanding was that you published your article on your blog for public scrutiny.
2) You put your version of the incident and I put mine. I was hoping you would let your readers decide by publishing it in your blog.
I am sure readers will give their opinion and that is what we both want to see in our forum and in our society at large. Your response to my email to you is completely out of context. If that were not the case, why did you not defend yourself by stating exactly where I was out of context? I went through your writing with a considerable amount of detail and attention, and explained where you went amiss and how you manipulated the story. I was hoping you would clarify where I misunderstood you or explain what I took out of context. Your response failed to do neither.
If memory serves me right, you were complaining, earlier this year, that some sites were not publishing your articles. You sent your email correspondence with those sites to Aiga forum to be published. You challenged them saying they had to publish it, even though they don't agree with your views. So, my friend, you now have a chance to prove to them that you are a better person than them by publishing my response on your blog....to present it to public scrutiny. You must not miss this opportunity to prove that everyone is wrong about you. As for debating me in Civility room, you are more than welcome there, and even though you feel your match is the Prime Minster, I will try my best to engage you. Civility, however, might not be interested and you should ask the admin. However, you have the freedom to post it on your blog, and to respond to it. That way, you will have some sense of the public's reaction. If many of the participants disagree with me, I will have learned that I thought wrongly about you and I will apologize. If a good number of people agree with me…you should, for starters, really assess yourself and the way you treat issues and people. I am sure you will discover that you stepped on a few toes unawares. I do believe you want to bring change to our country but your God complex has clouded your thinking. The best way to bring democracy to our country is to engage in well-considered discussions and debates, and to express in writing what we are doing, with which I am sure you will agree.
I chatted with you to tell you that I responded to your article. However, you took over the conversation and proceeded to tell me you are a pro in paltalk, and volunteered advice about life. I let you continue because I was getting free consultation. I thought that as a doctor, with your Hippocratic obligations to help people in need, maybe you sensed I needed help. I was comfortable chatting with you. I am sure you are a good person but your ego is interfering with what you want to express. You are a solipsist, a narcissist, and are genuinely convinced that you are better than others. You think very highly of your thoughts, with no margin for error. All this is your right but, unfortunately, it becomes dangerous when you are trying to be a political advisor. Your reason for helping your motherland - because your family is poor - is understandable. I do believe that, as a medical doctor, you have the means to help. Ethiopia badly needs doctors and you can offer assistance in your field.
You wrote in your response to keep my advice to myself, yet when you put articles on your blog and indicate your email address, you are inviting members of the public to share our opinions. If you don't want to hear from your readers, I would suggest you remove your email address and instruct us to please not respond to you, and that you prefer not to hear opinions with which you disagree. You should also include a word or two about freedom of speech. That will clarify to us the kind of democracy of which you speak.
When you posted your article, I am sure your intent was for it to stimulate debate, for it to be a topic of conversation, and not directed exclusively at an imaginary "amen corner." So you shouldn't take criticism personally. You have made yourself a public figure and that comes with the territory.
I know you will do the right thing by publishing my response to your article and let the public decide. That is also another method of debate.
God bless you and good luck
Etafulove
Dear Etafu:
I am very impressed with your mastery of the English language and the depth and seriousness with which you have taken this issue. You are free to post your comments/criticisms on my blog. I don't have to do that for you. I am a little busy the next few weeks, but I will respond to you in detail as soon as I get the time and muster the energy to do it. In the meantime, relax and take it easy. You only live once!
Washera
Dear Washera,
You are so predictable. The tone of your first email was ornery. You even told me to keep my advice to myself and sounded surprised that someone dared respond to your article. I was surprised to discover no one else commented on your article and was wondering why you took your time to respond to me. You attempted humor in your second email, which I found interesting. I am eagerly anticipating the third one, to see if my guess is correct. I hope you recover your strength and are less busy soon as I am eagerly anticipating a response as entertaining as your previous emails.
My intention was never to impress you but was a reaction of disbelief to the incident I witnessed being manipulated. If you were not serious, you should have somehow indicated that you were joking, perhaps that would have been a good punch line. Unlike you, I take the Ethiopian situation to heart. I am sure Teddy and his mom are going through a heck of a time as he might end up spending fifteen years in prison should he be found guilty and, sadly, you seemed to have found that amusing. You took cheap shots at Teddy from the comfort of your American home, noting that you were simply taking advantage of your freedom to express your thoughts and accusing him of siding with the opposition. For your information, many people died in our country to bring that very freedom of speech and there are many others still struggling to ensure that what is written on the constitution is fully implemented in our lifetime. For those of us in the Diaspora, it is priviledge we take for granted and we have the luxury to enjoy our debates and disagreements in peace. And if we become famous in the process, that is a bonus. If you remember the 2005 election, people paid with their life for decisions that were, for the most part, influenced by members of the diaspora.
Personally, if I want to reflect on something on publicly, it is on a topic on which I have a depth of knowledge so that my audience take me seriously. Nevertheless, your last response comes not as a surprise; you proved my point and I rest my case.
I am somewhat sympathetic to your conceited behaviour. We regard our doctors with enormous respect and that would go to anyone's head. If you remember, you informed me you are a medical doctor after only two lines of chatting when we first began to communicate. That was clearly designed to awe me. I then asked myself why you would use a pseudonym sans "Dr." Allow me to make a suggestion, if you don’t mind. Why not change your name to Dr. Washera, MD. There will be no false pretences - all participants will immediately know to whom they are writing.
As for posting this somewhere down your blog, might I suggest placing it next to your original post? That's because your readers might not see the comment link. I posted all our email exchanges there for your readers to see but, unfortunately, it is not located immediately after your original post.
Thank you for your suggestion that I “relax and take it easy" since I only liveonce. I have much to say about the other article you posted but, thank you very much, this will be enough for me.
God Bless you!
Etafulove
http://www.addisfortune.com/fortune_editors_note.htm
Post a Comment